🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord designed to protect women from violence, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in Riga this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final authority now rests with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to begin the process of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a significant setback for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its emphasis on equal rights undermines family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main parties advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose head has called on the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has sparked broad protest both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be maintained. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing MPs of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Possible Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, instances of femicide and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority support, the president could possibly return the bill for additional consideration if he holds objections.

President Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to constitutional requirements, "considering state and legal factors, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in our nation but across Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in several European countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could affect similar discussions in additional member states